Why DFA's new research is flawed |
Angela Ashton | PortfolioConstruction Forum | 21 October 2013
"Why DFA's New Research is Flawed" by Michael Edesess, Advisor Perspectives, 10 September 2013 This article, and DFA's subsequent silence on the issues raised, has prompted a storm of response both for and against Edesess's stance, and has caused a frenzy in the blogosphere. Edesess's article is a response to a short paper in DFA's May 2013 Quarterly Institutional Review, "Expected Profitability: A New Dimension of Expected Returns", which discussed ... |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f9d3/9f9d3dd2649a57ed905c5f185492511e9f1d747c" alt=""
Not yet a Member? It’s quick and free to join. Already a member? Please log in.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5256f/5256f519997a06639e09ccc5146d04258d76a72b" alt=""
© 2013 Portfolio Construction Forum, Brillient Investment Publishing Pty Ltd ABN 19 122 531 337. All rights reserved.
Refer Terms & Conditions of Use.
Similar Articles