Structural changes in equities markets and the global economy – rather than a collapse in manager skill – have contributed widespread underperformance and increasing correlations amongst traditional active equities strategies. This is likely to persist and provide further support for allocation decisions towards passive, enhanced index and, more recently, systematic equities strategies. Meanwhile, less diversification of inherent factor exposures in traditional fundamental strategies and increasing correlations in performance have introduced additional risk. There is a still a case for fundamental active strategies in portfolios, but it favours a more tactical (and inherently risky) approach – or complementarity within the context of total portfolios. Fundamental active equity allocations should be shorter term, tactical, alpha seeking allocations and/or focused on alpha generating strategies that help to reduce overall portfolio risk.
For decades, portfolio construction followed a simple division of labour - the core delivered broad market beta, while the satellite played a small supporting role, used selectively to pursue excess returns through active management. That blueprint is being rewritten and the challenge for allocators, is this: satellite allocations are the drivers of outperformance and missing a theme can cost portfolios dearly. Today’s forces shaping investment outcomes extend beyond traditional asset-class boundaries. Artificial intelligence, defence spending, energy security, infrastructure investment and geopolitical fragmentation are creating investment opportunities that broad market exposures struggle to capture. At the same time, the implementation toolkit has evolved, providing greater precision to structural themes, sectors, commodities and trends that are expected to drive returns. What were once considered peripheral portfolio exposures are increasingly being used to express high-conviction views and position portfolios for changing market regimes. Portfolio construction is moving beyond asset-class labels and deliberately selecting the exposures that matter most. Many of the most important portfolio decisions are no longer being made in traditional core allocations, but in the targeted exposures investors choose to build around them.
Traditional long-only active management is failing investors. Decades of evidence show that the average active manager underperforms the market after fees. The challenge is intensifying as data proliferates, compute becomes cheaper, and markets become increasingly concentrated. A new approach is required. Systematic investing harnesses vast datasets and quantitative models to identify and exploit market inefficiencies at scale. Its disciplined, rules-based process dramatically expands research bandwidth while reducing behavioural bias. Active extension goes further, investing more in the most attractive opportunities while generating returns from the least attractive through short positions. Empirical evidence shows that systematic active-extension strategies have historically outperformed traditional long-only active managers by significant margins, both in Australia and globally. That is the prize!
In a world of structural change, geopolitical uncertainty and technological disruption, traditional portfolio diversifiers are no longer delivering the outcomes investors expect. Bonds offer both lower income and less diversification than they have provided historically. Australian institutional senior secured lending combines consistent income, low volatility, low correlation to traditional asset classes and capital preservation through security, covenants and strong lender protections. For investors seeking to keep their "eyes on the prize" of long-term investor financial wellbeing, the focus should be on building more resilient portfolios by substituting traditional bond allocations with a growing allocation to Australian institutional senior secured lending, as a source of consistent income, capital stability and diversification.
he forces of innovation and disruption, and changes in investors’ discount rates, drive significant rotations in markets. Neither can be reliably forecast. The corporate life cycle concept describes how companies’ returns on capital progress through five stages: Accelerating, Compounding, Fading, Mature and Turnaround. A company’s position tells you how it is exposed to the forces of innovation and disruption , how it can create wealth and how its valuation might respond to changes in investors’ discount rates. In global equities, portfolios balanced through this lens are resilient to market rotations and have more of their risk concentrated in stock specific risk which is aligned with stock pickers’ edge. This lens keeps allocators’ eyes on the prize: a balanced global equity core portfolio that can perform through changing markets.
Many investors continue to classify Global Listed Infrastructure as a satellite or alternative allocation only – despite its resilience and earnings growth outlook becoming stronger and more durable. Rising power demand, energy security and mobility are supporting sustained growth for monopolistic assets providing essential services and networks that underpin economies. While infrastructure retains defensive characteristics, its role in portfolios has evolved beyond diversification and downside protection. Investors who cling to outdated asset class classifications risk overlooking Global Listed Infrastructure – an asset class capable of combining inflation protection, income and structural growth – which is worthy of a larger, core allocation in portfolios through an investor’s lifecycle.
Portfolio construction must evolve to reflect a structurally different world. Traditional diversification assumptions and portfolio frameworks which may not fully capture the risks to which portfolios are actually exposed - or take advantage of emerging asset class opportunities that the structurally different world is exposing.
How can practitioners construct multi-asset, multi-manager investment (MAMMI) portfolios which are greater than the sum of their parts and improve the financial wellbeing of individuals?
As investors navigate a new market regime, maintaining eyes on the prize means preserving investment objectives. Asset Based Finance (ABF) can enhance portfolio construction outcomes through attractive income, downside protection and low correlation to traditional asset classes. This multi-trillion-dollar market is poised for significant growth, providing essential funding across the real economy including credit card receivables, installment loans, revenue-based financings and mission-critical equipment leasing. Structural forces are reshaping the asset class, driving institutional and wealth investors to allocate to ABF to fill gaps in traditional fixed income portfolios. ABF is a powerful portfolio diversifier and a differentiated source of income, complimenting traditional direct lending. As the private credit market continues to evolve, ABF represents its next frontier.
Conventional wisdom holds that fixed income exists to protect investors when equities fall. That protection rests on a reliable negative correlation between bonds and equities and was supported by a decades-long bull market in bonds, both of which have broken down since the Covid19 pandemic. With the diversification prize no longer guaranteed, the case for holding bonds must rest on something more durable. Keeping eyes on the prize means owning fixed income for the return it generates, rather than the insurance it once provided. The implication for portfolio construction is a shift toward strategies built for income generation, capital stability, and liquidity, positioning fixed income as a reliable source of return in its own right, rather than a mere hedge when another asset class falls.
Portfolios built for the world of the last several decades are not necessarily going to win the prize in the one decade ahead, as fiscal, AI and geopolitical forces reshape the macro-outlook in ways that are hard to predict. What is predictable is that real assets with the right characteristics are strategically important for an investment portfolio regardless of which way these forces break. Global listed infrastructure is the ultimate real asset. It offers the key characteristics allocators seek through structural growth, inflation protection and defensive income qualities rooted in essential services. These characteristics, not a label or a bucket, are what earn listed infrastructure its place in a well-constructed portfolio.
Conflict, strategic competition, defence spending, energy insecurity and supply-chain redesign are impacting inflation, fiscal policy, interest rates, currencies and cross-asset correlations. Growing our knowledge of what drives geopolitics dramatically improves our ability to identify and understand the related economic risks that are impacting investment markets, to ensure that geopolitical resilience is baked into portfolios.
This session first considered how practitioners can apply multi-lens analysis via AI to decide their key takeouts and next steps from Strategies Summit 2026. Then, our Practitioner Panel discussed which high conviction thesis they heard at Strategies Summit they would investigate further, why, and how.
Markets returned to record highs during the past week, but the most important development was not in equities. It was in the bond market. For much of the post-financial-crisis period, central banks were the dominant influence on the cost of capital. Increasingly, the bond market is reclaiming that role.
This Research Spotlight focuses on the Royal London Global Equity Select strategy, a benchmark-unaware global equities strategy utilising a business life cycle investment approach to identify materially undervalued companies.
Dating back to the 13th century, trade finance - loans that provide short-term financing to support the physical flow of goods - is one of the oldest forms of credit. More investors are turning towards this asset class as a diversifier in their portfolios.
Markets experienced one of the most violent reversals of the artificial-intelligence cycle during the past week, but the most important development was not the fall itself. It was what happened next.
Markets have absorbed an extraordinary amount of bad news without suffering an equally extraordinary decline. That resilience has been supported by strong economic and corporate fundamentals. The problem is that resilience is now widely expected.
For much of the AI boom, markets rewarded scale. The debate is shifting from investment to productivity, from infrastructure to monetisation and from technological capability to economic return.
Practitioners are increasingly in the business of navigating - and helping clients navigate - the complex moral landscape of investing. This paper explores the extent to which culture impacts on our morality.
The next phase of the cycle may not be determined by who spends the most capital. It may be determined by who earns the highest return on that capital. That is a more demanding environment. It is also a healthier one.
